The first slope is always the steepest. Motivational slogan turned muscle-straining reality on the road up past Logie Kirk. It was my favourite old walk, last done nine months ago when I had by feeling, not thought, developed the habit of jogging up and running down 'my' mountain. With the intervening nine months spent with my legs furled under a desk in London, that idea felt practically lethal...
***
It was a delicate Scottish morning. Silver sky and smirr and Blackbirds softly singing. I'd been back in my adopted home of Stirling for a couple of days. Long enough to reacquaint myself with the murmurations of daffodils and the neat borders of Starlings, Goosanders surfing the muddy Forth, and the amount of rain the sky above Scotland holds. While London sweltered (21 degrees!) Stirling was chilly and overcast with breaks of torrential rain, hail and the occasional flurry of snow. Smirr was a relatively clear break and I headed for the hills with Mareike. She’s from the flatlands too — the East Anglian part of Germany — and also feels drawn to the north and to mountains, and to walking quietly in each other's shy company.
I set an asthmatic pace, but one at which I made it up the first slope without pausing, until the sheep replaced the trees. The smirr was dissipating and the first hazy view down the valley emerged. I take a glug of water. I don't feel as bad as I had expected. The road hits the path, a broad and well trodden track over long brown grass, damp green moss and squidgy black peat. It feels good to have it under foot, as if the tread of my boots feels at home here too. Four Ravens cackle and tumble through the sky. Sheep bleat and Stirling gets rained upon. We peer down glens to the hillfoot villages and Forth valley sprawl, clouded in the hazy air of mild wet March. Menstrie, Alloa, Kincardine. Defiant patches of blue appear in the sky.
Pushing on. Each thigh stretching step up seemed to slough off the dust from desk bound muscles. A stirring in the sinews that says that hills should really be taken at a canter and with a manic grin. Towards the summit the moss and the grass get gradually replaced by heather, then rock. Sometimes there are grouse here but only Skylarks sung between the ground and the sky.
From the south these mountains appear suddenly out of the Forth valley like a doorstop, keeping the highlands out of Southern Scotland. Up close they are mostly smooth lumps with the exception of this one. Dumyat is rough and ragged, craggy and the only one with significant patches of bare rock. It is the most visibly volcanic of them all, and the most dramatic, despite being a domestic 418 metres high. The wee pet. A mountain in geographer's definition only. But its character defies its height. When I was at university here I walked it religiously in a physical counterpart to the austere pews and psalms of the church in the next village along. I didn’t, couldn’t, get bored of it. Brooding or benevolent. Golden still afternoons or mornings lashed by weather. The lamb and the Raven.
***
You can take this mountain far too gently. It can still spring surprises.
Three quarters of the way up I turn to Mareike and remark on the kind weather. She smiles. I scramble up the next outcrop of bare rock and turn onto the final rocky slope to the summit, and a slap of wind takes the breathe from me. We double over and carry on, hands on the rock for extra grip. From the summit cairn we can view from the Braes of Doune to the Forth rail bridge and beyond, the firth disappearing into hazy sky that reaches around to the Lammermuirs and loses half of Fife to flat nothing. Moors ripple away over outcrops of rock to the valley, or to the rest of the Ochils to the north and east. The rest of the Ochils are the land of hill farmers and their flocks, an off brown baize stained with bracken and gorse where the sheep can't reach, the odd crumbling shieling and one thin reservoir carved into the contours. A Raven skims the summit, low and flexing its body to sail across the wind. It turns back and flies once again low over us, to check if we were dead — I assume — and it flies away disappointed. I hadn’t felt this alive in months.
And the wind buffets us again, in the space of half of a minute going from mild inconvenience to shivering cold, pulling on new layers and trying not to be caught like a parachute. Mareike leans back into it, gleeful. I give up attempting to stand straight, and the joy of irresistible wind catches me too.
***
On the way down I would slip over twice. Mareike didn’t, so covered herself in mud out of sympathy, and then slapped me around the face with a little more, to weird looks from other walkers. Exhausted and covered in mud: my childhood requirements for fun still exist. I hope I never let them leave.
Wednesday, 19 March 2014
Monday, 27 January 2014
It could have been a scene from Scandinavia: the silver birch and the rusting bracken, thick dark mud and lashing hail. It lasted for two skin stinging minutes. The wood thinned out. Bracken gave way to heather, the hail to the numbing wind, and the path to a bridleway of finest sludgey mud, studded with white ice. Half a kilometre over the heath to a clump of pines where the Parrot Crossbills are and the clouds break up; the last hour or so of sunlight appearing over the distant pines. All around was heather, oak, pine and birch; damp and glittering in the light. It is tempting to lose yourself in this landscape that feels so old and right and proper.
It is not Scandinavia. Not even Scotland. It is Nottinghamshire.
Behind the pines on the horizon the black edge of a slag heap can be seen. The product of a hundred or so years of removing useful things from the earth and putting it back somewhere else. The map is ridden with names that tell my dad - Nottinghamshire lad - of the old pits and collieries that were shut as he grew up. They're just names on a map to me. Further back, and the animals that would've kept this area open and unwooded have been replaced by conservationists, counter intuitively pulling out trees in the name of nature. It's in the name: Budby Common. Ignore the fences passed on the way here and it still appears like the common lands of a John Clare poem, though lacking in its people.
Curious landscape paradox. It is deeply coloured by human hand yet it looks and feels untouched.
Parrot Crossbills. Large red finches from Scandinavia, they are rarities that turn up on the back of a poor pine seed crop in the Arctic taiga, in search of food. I had tried and failed to see them elsewhere three times this winter. The itinerant nature that brings them here also makes them hard to catch up with. This time felt luckier. A birder we had met on the way here had successfully seen them and gave us directions to the pines on this heath.
We were not lucky. Damp and cold, we saw Common Buzzards shrieking over the woods and Jays flash exotically against the sky, but nothing particularly out of a birder's idea of the ordinary. It's only on the long dark train ride home that I begin to wonder why we do it. Why I, in particular, turn my nose up at the idea of twitching, but continually return to places where Parrot Crossbills have been seen and will be seen by seemingly everybody but me. I don’t keep doing it for the dubious honour of being Britain’s unluckiest birder.
I’ve been birding for eight years to general apathy from friends and occasional hostility from others. But oddly there’s been a recent flourishing of interest from several people, mostly focusing on why we do it, why we ‘just look at them?’. It’s a question that opens a gap of mutual incomprehensibility. They can’t understand the interest, and I can’t understand why they’re not. I have to explain my hobby and the seeming irrationality of it.
I’ve always been interested in animals, since childhood visits to the zoo, watching birds on the garden feeders and being sat in front of the Lion King and Free Willy, my favourite films as a kid. I’ve been a fisherman - fly and coarse - but thankfully never a hunter. I found watching wild animals to be the best route to knowing and to experiencing nature with as minimal an impact as possible. I would feel the thrill of catching a fish between the waits that seemed like they would never end. I would feel conflicted about hauling it on to land, looking at it, then putting it back. Better to have never taken it out in the first place? I recognise that need though, the drive that makes the fisherman spend days on the lakeside, waiting for the elusive fish bite. I don’t know why millions of people will watch Attenborough documentaries, but never try to seek out nature for themselves, unmediated and with the intimacy of real experience.
I will keep trying to get to know nature. Nature may be amorphous and defies definition at every attempt, but for me that’s part of the attraction. It is at once full of things to learn and full of things that are unknowable. It takes me to silent places and a horizon without houses, but lets me hear the beating of my heart, and hold conversations with the most interesting people.
The box-ticking, blinkered, crowd mentality of twitching is something I find very distasteful, but with my attempted twitches of Parrot Crossbills it’s taken me to new places, on the Essex coast and in my own home county. It’s shown me the loveliest part of Nottinghamshire.
All without the actual birds.
All in the act of just looking.
It is not Scandinavia. Not even Scotland. It is Nottinghamshire.
Behind the pines on the horizon the black edge of a slag heap can be seen. The product of a hundred or so years of removing useful things from the earth and putting it back somewhere else. The map is ridden with names that tell my dad - Nottinghamshire lad - of the old pits and collieries that were shut as he grew up. They're just names on a map to me. Further back, and the animals that would've kept this area open and unwooded have been replaced by conservationists, counter intuitively pulling out trees in the name of nature. It's in the name: Budby Common. Ignore the fences passed on the way here and it still appears like the common lands of a John Clare poem, though lacking in its people.
Curious landscape paradox. It is deeply coloured by human hand yet it looks and feels untouched.
Parrot Crossbills. Large red finches from Scandinavia, they are rarities that turn up on the back of a poor pine seed crop in the Arctic taiga, in search of food. I had tried and failed to see them elsewhere three times this winter. The itinerant nature that brings them here also makes them hard to catch up with. This time felt luckier. A birder we had met on the way here had successfully seen them and gave us directions to the pines on this heath.
We were not lucky. Damp and cold, we saw Common Buzzards shrieking over the woods and Jays flash exotically against the sky, but nothing particularly out of a birder's idea of the ordinary. It's only on the long dark train ride home that I begin to wonder why we do it. Why I, in particular, turn my nose up at the idea of twitching, but continually return to places where Parrot Crossbills have been seen and will be seen by seemingly everybody but me. I don’t keep doing it for the dubious honour of being Britain’s unluckiest birder.
I’ve been birding for eight years to general apathy from friends and occasional hostility from others. But oddly there’s been a recent flourishing of interest from several people, mostly focusing on why we do it, why we ‘just look at them?’. It’s a question that opens a gap of mutual incomprehensibility. They can’t understand the interest, and I can’t understand why they’re not. I have to explain my hobby and the seeming irrationality of it.
I’ve always been interested in animals, since childhood visits to the zoo, watching birds on the garden feeders and being sat in front of the Lion King and Free Willy, my favourite films as a kid. I’ve been a fisherman - fly and coarse - but thankfully never a hunter. I found watching wild animals to be the best route to knowing and to experiencing nature with as minimal an impact as possible. I would feel the thrill of catching a fish between the waits that seemed like they would never end. I would feel conflicted about hauling it on to land, looking at it, then putting it back. Better to have never taken it out in the first place? I recognise that need though, the drive that makes the fisherman spend days on the lakeside, waiting for the elusive fish bite. I don’t know why millions of people will watch Attenborough documentaries, but never try to seek out nature for themselves, unmediated and with the intimacy of real experience.
I will keep trying to get to know nature. Nature may be amorphous and defies definition at every attempt, but for me that’s part of the attraction. It is at once full of things to learn and full of things that are unknowable. It takes me to silent places and a horizon without houses, but lets me hear the beating of my heart, and hold conversations with the most interesting people.
The box-ticking, blinkered, crowd mentality of twitching is something I find very distasteful, but with my attempted twitches of Parrot Crossbills it’s taken me to new places, on the Essex coast and in my own home county. It’s shown me the loveliest part of Nottinghamshire.
All without the actual birds.
All in the act of just looking.
Monday, 6 January 2014
Slow, Steady
If a pan-list is a survey of the wildlife that I can find
then it doubles up as a survey of my natural history knowledge, and it didn’t
take long to find the edges of that. All it took was a single white flower. My
knowledge with wildflowers is appalling, but this is winter; it’s small, white,
and sort of resembles an Umbellifer, but bunched into a ball instead of spread
out on a flat circle. I took a couple of photos and moved on. How hard could it
be? Very, apparently. I flicked through my copy of Harrap’s Wild Flowers several times and couldn’t
even find a resemblance, let alone an exact match. This feels like beginning
again without a teacher. Exciting to think about but frustrating in practice.
If a pan-list emphasises the limits of what I know, then it celebrates what I do. I know it feels as though it has rained for the last forty days and forty nights. And after that? Sun. A sky the colour of a Caribbean sea and Song Thrushes singing from a bare brown tree, bathed in the winter sunshine. I know I didn’t feel the cold either, despite being ankle deep in a puddle and the shards of ice not yet thawed out from over night. It wouldn’t take long. After all that rain it doesn’t feel as if the life has been washed out, but renewed. The grass is verdant green, and the gorse is flecked with its first yellow flowers. And the birds carry on singing.
I know I achieved the zen of the birder too. In the absence
of a genuine solitude, it’s the next best thing. In one of the corners of the
park, Redwings and Blackbirds flocked. Imperceptibly I stopped looking about
me, and a quiet, calm concentration descended. Thought evaporated and movement
became by instinct, and the tracking of the flocks of thrushes took on a
rhythmical meditative quality. I glance up out of instinct and my eyes cross
the flight path of a Great Spotted Woodpecker, then the next time, a
Sparrowhawk. Both were new for the list.
I know I miss that state when the path takes me away from
the birds and towards the eastern end of the Scrubs. The bare end, of football pitches
and a small gull flock that would be to dogs what catnip is to cats, if only
they could catch it. They never do. The trees here line the edges between the
grass and the road. It feels bleaker and more lifeless, colder and windier. I
don’t enjoy this end. The birder zen evaporates and the simple pleasures found
at the other end, of three species of thrush in one tree, aren’t to be found.
I don’t mind, particularly, The urban naturalist knows you
take those pleasures where you can and hold on to them as you tramp down the
cracked paving slabs, past the tube station and back towards home.
15. Robin
16. Song Thrush
17. Dunnock
18. Redwing
19. Hawthorn
20. Goldfinch
21. Great Tit
22. Buddleia
23. Great Spotted Woodpecker
24. Sparrowhawk
25. Wren
26. Gorse
27. to be
identified?
Wednesday, 1 January 2014
Fireworks
After the bang… the whimper of wind and dull percussion of
rain. I peak behind the curtains and see grey and roll over. An hour later I’m
at the local park being cold spin-washed by the weather, with added hail. The
path is a quagmire. Beside me a steady stream of neon-clothed cross-country
runners splash past. I am sober and with not even the slightest hint of a
hangover. I look up as the eleventh species of the day – a parakeet – flies
overhead, all dark against the sky.
I slip my welly off to shake out the dried old mud digging
into my sock. 11 pence falls into a puddle instead. In the bush to my left a
Blackbird cocks its head at me, quizzically (or so it seemed) before flitting
into cover.
New year, new list.
I haven’t listed since I was a teenager, when it was a
useful method of working out which of the three or four other teenage birders I
talked to were ‘better’ or ‘worse’ than me. I realised the absurdity of this
soon enough. I didn’t like the idea of being able to distil the richness of my
birding experiences into a spreadsheet of seen and unseen. I didn’t like the
way it compelled me to have a hit list of species I shamefully hadn’t seen; or
gave me a number with which to judge myself with - and find myself wanting.
Giving up the list was one of the best things I have ever done as a birder.
Among the other best things: Lepidoptera, Odonata, Orthoptera, etc. Entomology
filled in the gaps and gave me new horizons.
And this is where listing reappears. Last year the birders
of Wormwood Scrubs cumulatively reached 98 species of birds for the year, a
phenomenal achievement for a London park with no standing water and a skyline
including the Shard and the London Eye. In the process they turned up such
birds as a Common Rosefinch and a Short-eared Owl. I dipped the Rosefinch in
the pissing rain on my first visit. It’s still a species I haven’t seen. The
Scrubs is in the odd position then of having a proven track record of turning
up good birds, but also great potential for turning up more in the most
unexpected of ways. I was amazed by the snipe I saw here, I can’t imagine what
I’d do if I saw that Short-eared Owl here, let alone that Rosefinch.
But that’s not quite good enough to sustain through the long
summer months, of getting up at 6am and traversing it before work. So I plan to
do a pan-species yearlist. At the moment it seems to be the perfect motivator,
to get out and around the Scrubs and to carry on broadening my entomological
knowledge, and those of other taxas. I might not be saying that come September,
but we’ll see. My list at the moment is fourteen and I see no rush. At the
start of January a year seems a very long time indeed.
1: Starling
2: Feral Pigeon
3: Black-headed Gull
4: Homo sapiens*
5: Canis lupus
familiaris**
6: Common Gull
7: Carrion Crow
8: Magpie
9: Blue Tit
10: Long-tailed Tit
11: Ring-necked Parakeet
12: Blackbird
13 Grey Squirrel
*Mark Telfer, aka Mr Panlist, says I can.
** And the rules allow you alien species whose existence is
entirely reliant on humans.
Monday, 2 December 2013
Two Suffolks
The Sandlings lie a few miles back from the Suffolk coast. A
long strip of heathland on sandy soil they, like the Brecks at the other end of
Suffolk, have been ploughed up or planted with pine. But unlike the Brecks, the
heather here still clings to more than just the edges. At Tunstall the heather
veins with the Scots Pine and birch that run around the main body of the pine
plantation. Orange leaves still cling to the birch, and the heather is still
dark purple. It’s pretty for the Forestry Commission. But that shouldn’t be too
much of a surprise. East Suffolk is (to this Suffolk boy at least) the
prettiest flat landscape in England.
I’m sure the riders on horses the colour of the pine bark
would agree. And the dweller in the cottage surrounded by the wood. The flat-capped
gent from the local church bell-ringing guild out for a stroll; and the half of
London that bought homes out here to live like Mr and Mrs Andrews. The other birder? He’s chewing his lip
and staring into the tops of the pines. There is no sign of any crossbills,
neither the resident Commons or the vagrant Parrot Crossbills, driven here from
deep in the Scandinavian forests and found last weekend.
There is little sign of any birdlife at all. Flocks of crows
from nearby pig fields fly over; a few Goldcrests slip quietly through the
branches of the pines. It’s almost as if behind the façade of prettiness
there’s not a lot here.
I stumble across what actually is there by accident. I have
a habit from life as an introvert of naturally looking at my feet. Sometimes it
comes in handy. Coming past a stand of birch my neck drooped, and amongst the
grass and dying bracken I found a Fly Agaric, glowing redder than a Robin.
It’s
the ur-mushroom. Other than those you find in the supermarket, most people of
my generation found their first fungi through Super Mario. In that pixelated universe
of running and jumping a Fly Agaric-like mushroom will help you power up. In
the real world it will make you hallucinate and, I quote, ‘cause sweat-inducing
poisoning, stimulating the secretory glands and [induce] symptoms which include
profuse salivation and sweating’. A severe case will apparently kill
you. But the Fly Agaric is friendly compared to the other species of fungi in
its genus, such as the Fool’s Mushroom, the Death’s Cap or the European
Destroying Angel.
***
Day two. The west. Crisp winter air and a faded blue sky.
The smell of sugar beet colours the air and a slight haze blurs the horizon
over the fields. A Green Woodpecker flicks up from the cemetery and flies into
the old oak. A Nuthatch calls. The woodpecker laughs, or yaffles in the old
dialect. The beet is piled up by the field edges before being moved to the
local sugar factory, whose cooling tower dominates the local skyline. Early
winter on these roads is characterised by open-topped lorries thundering around
the bends, occasionally shedding the odd beet that you can pick up from the
verge. The lorries coat the road in a slick of wet mud and oil, and close to
home, a dead badger. This is not pretty Suffolk, but a Suffolk, of tractors,
lorries, towers on the horizon and a deep dark mud that stains my jeans, that
sucks in feet and only begrudgingly spits them back out. This is the Suffolk of
my home.
Wednesday, 27 November 2013
Brighter Later
It was a brighter morning than the last two, less wintry as
well. The mud underfoot was soft and the puddles not iced over. An ice blue sky
stretched over London, the backdrop to an insipid sunrise and dappled grey
clouds. Still winter then. Breath clouded in front of me and everything seemed
pale and calm. The cold keeps the dog walkers away, but makes the morning
struggle with the dead weight of the duvet one I more often lose than win.
Walking out across the pitches I notice the gulls that roost
here are already mostly gone. Only a few remain to be mobbed by the restless
crows for any worms their pattering feet bring to the surface. I track one idly
in flight. A first winter, it is already agile enough to keep the crows at bay,
but maybe they’re not seriously pursuing it. Dull brown feathers are scattered
across the wings and body like little autumn leaves. I continue to follow it as
it comes back across and morphs from the expected Black-headed Gull into a
Common Gull. I’d misjudged the size; and the everyday turns into something
different. Not exciting – by coincidence the common in the name also suggests something
of its regularity – and not something unexpected either, but something new. I’d
never seen one here before. I look around and find an adult perched on the
grass too. Crisp white and grey, as if it had been made of snow and shadows.
Maybe transformation was the theme of the walk.
Halfway across the park and looking back over my shoulder. A
crow sailed across the sky. As crows have done and will do, it looked dark and
angular and uncannily like a bird of prey. It came in across the park, holding
my attention when it banked, revealing a pale barred underbody. In an instant I
correct myself. Not crow but Peregrine Falcon. It flies into the sunrise but the
light is weak and I can still make out the plumage; the black hood and white
cheeks and the sheer muscular bulk of its body. It circles around and heads off
towards the tall towers of the city.
Transformations. Formerly one of Britain’s rarest birds and
inhabitant of the tallest cliffs in the remotest parts; a recently resurgent
population has taken them into our cities. The towers make perfect cliffs, with
a seemingly endless supply of pigeons. It could be one of London’s, or one from
further afield. Peregrine, from peregrinate, was first defined to me as ‘winter
wandering’: my dictionary only states ‘wandering’, but the winter part stuck.
The idea of winter’s nomadic Peregrine Falcons can’t be moved from my mind.
As it flies off into the sunrise I involuntarily dredge up
all the extraordinary facts about this species. But nothing quite compares to
the experience of actually seeing it. It transforms the morning from pleasant
to something electric. Not so much the spring, but the spark in my step.
A mixed flock of roughly forty Redwings and Fieldfares flew
over the tall trees to the north. I wonder what awaits them in Willesden, maybe
Wembley or perhaps even Watford? I wonder where they go, and where they roost.
I figure I’ll never know and not everything needs extraordinary facts. I stamp
off down the pavement to bring life to my numb cold toes. I walk past the tube
station against the tide of suits. Nobody makes eye contact with the man with
the binoculars, muddy-green coat and cheap wellies.
Monday, 4 November 2013
The Natural Eye
There is an owl glaring down at me as I have a cake with my
coffee. Its ear tufts are held in against its head, two bumps deviating from
the v-shaped brow that makes up the owl-frown and culminates in the hooked
beak, with piercing pale yellow eyes either side. The dull brown plumage is
delicately notched light and dark and fades out in drips of paint down to the
edge of the paper. It’s the most arresting image in the exhibition. And then
you realise it was painted by a teenager*.
The Natural Eye is the Society of Wildlife Artists’ annual exhibition
in the Mall Galleries, London. It is the one week in the year when a scrap
steel Giraffe towers over a limestone Ptarmigan within sight of Buckingham
Palace. It’s an unusual location. Wildlife art exists in an unhappy hinterland
between commercial twee and acceptance by mainstream contemporary art
galleries, particularly when compared to landscapes or portraiture. It strikes
me that nature writers such as Mark Cocker, Richard Mabey et al, never have
this problem as being accepted as a valid voice in contemporary literature. Ted
Hughes, poet of crows, foxes and hawks (amongst other things) became poet
laureate, for example. But with a mayfly-like lifespan, this gallery in the
heart of London throngs with the life and the rowdy, colourful chaos of nature.
After fifty years of the SWLA how is wildlife art looking?
And what is the purpose of wildlife art?
Colourful. That, at least, is the impression on first glance
of walls stuffed with paintings, woodcuts, linoprints and plinths of
sculptures. And birdy: if it was renamed the Society for Bird Art it seems that
not many of its members would complain. In Nick Derry’s art the two come
together joyously. His paintings are riots of colour: Red Kites on purple
paper; a Red-backed Shrike with a well-butchered hawker; Blue-headed Wagtails
feeding amongst flowers, Swallows and a Greenshank. There is a vernal joy here
that the artist sees and communicates in loose brushstrokes with all the life
and energy of the birds themselves. That for me is the purpose of wildlife art:
communicating the essence, the nature of nature.
The very best art here does that, and the best thing about
the exhibition is its presentation of so many different ways of seeing animals.
Darren Woodhead finds that nature through minimalism. Watercolours, painted in
the field on a white background and mostly consisting of just a tree and a bird;
they tell of windblown stories of migration, fleeting moments and occurrences
on the Lothian coast. Harriet Mead performs a kind of alchemy in turning
lifeless and rusty scrap steel into sculptures of hares, a heron, a giraffe. I
have no idea how its possible to turn callipers into feathers. Like I said,
some kind of alchemy. All these works are touched by abstraction. The natural
eye at its best sees beyond what is merely present and invests it with
something meaningful. The worst works here don’t do this. It feels unfair to
criticise any in particular but a reliance on the habitual ways of seeing
things, nothing beneath the surface prettiness that shackles a slightly
disappointing amount of work on show.
Oddly there is a lack of work with an obvious conservation
or cultural element to it. Very little of the art on display places an animal
into a human or human altered landscape, which is something I can’t quite
explain. Is there a fear of aestheticisng the ‘unnatural’? I found three
exceptions. Carry Akroyd’s Big Turns and Little Terns finds an echo in the
white angular wings of a foreground flock of terns and the blades of a distant
wind farm. It is a scene familiar to any Norfolk birder and I like how it makes
the connections in the scene, mercifully without picking a side. Bruce Pearson
should need no introduction and his work from time spent on South Atlantic trawlers
with the BirdLife albatross protection team is extraordinary: beautiful and
timely. Only one has made it into
the exhibition but with fisherman, fish and bird as its subject, he provides more
depth and balance than typically found in coverage of conservation issues.
The final exception is the likeliest to be hung as part of a
collection of contemporary art. A Blush by Fran Giffard is a series of diary
pages with exotic birds drawn in graphite and painted in aquarelle. Exotic birds
perch on top of lists and numbers, notes to self and accounts of the day. This
is how birds are for me. How they decorate the edges of the daily routine,
bring a touch of wonder to the mundane, every day.
For a fiftieth birthday snapshot of the work of its members,
The Natural Eye is eclectic, but the hits in this exhibition far outweigh the
misses and I left with my head full of ideas and the urge to pick up a pen and
draw for the first time in years. I think that counts as a success.
*Unforgivably I forgot to write down their name. It was the
winning image in the 13-19 year old age category.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)















